“Radiometric dating?” snorted Ray. “It’s useless in dating
the past!”

“What do you mean… useless?” I asked.

“Look,” said Ray. “I’ll give you an example. Human remains
found deep in the delta deposit near New Orleans, Louisiana,
were dated at 57,000 years – but when wood from the gunwhale
of a Kentucky flatboat was found deeper, the 57,000 years
shrank to 200 or less.

“You’re kidding!” I exclaimed.images (1)

“No, that was true. And do you know, C-14 dating of Egyptian
pharaohs’ tombs have registered mummies 500 years ‘older’
than their sarcophagi! And grains older than the containers
in which they were found.”

A field archaeologist must not take anything for granted.
This was something I had to check out.

During many years of living in Australia, I made several visits
to the island state of Tasmania. I know of a farmer near the
town of Burnie who was removing some fence posts on his
property. These had been set in the ground less than 100 yearsmummy2

He discovered that the in-ground portion of each post had
actually opalised.

The farmer mischievously sent samples of the petrified wood
to two Australian institutions, asking them to date the wood.
The institutions were La Trobe University in Melbourne and
the National University in Canberra.

The two labs dated the two specimens at two vastly different
ages – one insisting that the wood was 100,000 years old. When
the farmer protested that this was definitely not so, he was
assured that this HAD to be the age of the wood!

These kind of things began to get me worried. What was goingmummy3
on here? Can you see? Something is wrong – drastically wrong.
This kind of evidence should be enough to discredit the


I won’t bore you with how dating systems are worked out. But
I can tell you these. Most ages obtained by one method
DISAGREE with the ages obtained by other methods. For example,
most radiometric “ages” don’t match fossil “ages”.

But what about carbon dating? You ask. Carbon dating is used
to determine how long ago something died.

A series of measurements of samples of known age, extending
back about 3,800 years, has shown fairly good agreement. But
something dramatic occurred on earth about 4,300 years ago
to upset this. And beyond that time, dating figures run wild.


This may shock you, but a cover-up is in full swing. The
carbon-14 technique, during its development, uncovered some
startling, publicly undisclosed, evidence of an earth far
younger than you and I have been told.

There is a group of men will a philosophical mindset that
needs to bolster the evolution theory at all costs. And this
includes deceiving you and me, covering up evidence, and even
dumping a boat load of evidence in the Carribean Sea!

They are playing you and me for suckers. And many of us have
been swallowing it.

Just get this, will you? The same piece of basalt rock from
Nigeria gave ages (by different methods) from 2 to 750 million
years. (Nature Physical Science, vol.232, pp.60-61)

In eight separate tests, scientists dated samples of rock –
and arrived at ages of 160 million to 3 billion years.  These
specimens, from Kaupelehu, Hualalai Volcano, Hawaii, were later
found to have formed in a lava flow only 168 years earlier,
in 1801. (Science, vol.162, p.265. Journal of Geophysical
Research, vol.73, p.4601. American Journal of Science, vol.262,

Rock samples from twelve volcanoes in Russia and ten samples
from other parts of the world (all known to be less than 200
years old), gave ages by the uranium-thorium-to lead method
varying from millions to billions of years.

Suppose you were admitted to hospital. And after tests were made,
the doctors each gave you a different, contradictory diagnosis…
would you trust them to operate on you?

You’ve got to be kidding.

Now I’m worried.  These dating tests… have we been too trusting?

Think about it. If rocks of KNOWN ages yield such unrealistic
dates, why should we accept so gullibly the ages yielded by rocks
of UNKNOWN age?

What bothers me is this. We have otherwise cautious scientists
gulping down these datings about as avidly as the most gullible

Something is wrong here – drastically wrong – with our dating
systems.  If a construction engineer came up with contradictory
calculations like that, he would be dismissed from the construction

Henry Faul, writing in Nuclear Geology, says:

“MOST of the ages obtained by the lead: thorium method DISAGREE
with the ages of the same minerals computed by other lead methods.”
(Henry Faul, Nuclear Geology, p. 295)

TRUST us, they say. Our DATING is fine. The naivity of that claim
is so breathtaking, I need a glass of water.

And if you introduce a catastrophe (such as a global Deluge),
then the present state of the earth’s crust has not resulted from
long aeons of uniformity, but largely by natural processes acting
on a mega scale during the Deluge.

The truth is, every dating method we operate today is invalid
as a scientific test for the past. So when you’re told a
certain date has been proved, you’re hearing someone who
either doesn’t understand the scientific test, or who
(hopefully not) is deliberately lying to you.

Discordant dates (and that’s most of the tests) are not

How do you feel when you discover you’ve been cheated? Here
is information that is known to a few at the top – but not
told to us.

Is this because these dear, lovable elite persons have an

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. In my best selling
book “Dead Men’s Secrets” you have more than a thousand
forgotten wonders of past human knowledge.

Here’s where to go:

With kindest regards
Jonathan Gray


Did you enjoy this information?

If you know someone who would find these facts interesting,
Click the URL below now to email it to them, or copy and
paste the URL below into your browser.

You are welcome to put it on your own website
exactly as it is, without change, including our email a

International explorer, archaeologist and author Jonathan
Gray has traveled the world to gather data on ancient
mysteries. He has penetrated some largely unexplored
areas, including parts of the Amazon headwaters. The
author has also led expeditions to the bottom of the
sea and to remote mountain and desert regions of the
world. He lectures internationally.

Surprising Discoveries
Pacific Coast Highway
PO Box 785
Thames 3540
New Zealand



About Jonathan Gray

International explorer, archaeologist and author Jonathan Gray has travelled the world to gather data on ancient mysteries. Jonathan has published more than 100 books and videos, written several hundred papers, and hosted newspaper columns. He writes in a popular, conversational style, but with a keen eye for evidence to support his findings. The documentation sometimes includes certificates, private letters and facts that others refuse to publish. A controversial, highly sought after speaker, Jonathan has appeared on numerous television and radio shows worldwide, and lectures to audiences on every continent. He is a hands-on archaeologist. Over the past 47 years, he has penetrated some largely unexplored areas, including parts of the Amazon headwaters. He has also led expeditions to the bottom of the sea and to remote mountain and desert regions of the world. His findings include evidence of ancient Egyptians in the Americas, remains of ancient giants on a remote Pacific island and of Egyptian chariot parts and skeletal remains scattered over the seabed. As distinct from the general archaeologist who specialises in a particular locality or theme of interest, Jonathan Gray’s research is into global patterns. This unique approach has propelled him to the forefront of little-known discoveries that shake traditional theories of our past. Archaeology first grabbed Jonathan at the age of ten – when he read a magazine article telling how British explorer Percy Fawcett had found a dead, vine choked city in the wilds of the Amazon. The ruins were guarded by savages wielding clubs and poison darts. As it turned out, Jonathan’s first expedition was into that same unexplored region… where natives shrank human heads to the size of an orange. In the course of his explorations in more than 30 countries, Jonathan began to uncover evidence of surprising “out of place” artefacts. According to what he was taught at school, these were impossible! They simply should not exist! And these were not just isolated anomalies. There was a global pattern to them, suggesting an ancient worldwide civilization of astonishing proportions. That’s when he knew that someone had to speak up. He realised that this information was of tremendous value. WEBSITES, BOOKS, DVDs WEBSITE http://www.beforeus.com BOOKS Dead Men's Secrets: 
http://www.beforeus.com * * * * * * * 
More Dead Men's Secrets: 
* * * * * * * 
The Bizarre Origin of Egypt's Ancient Gods: 
http://www.beforeus.com/egyptgods.php * * * * * * * The Lost World of Giants: 
http://www.beforeus.com/giants.php * * * * * * * 64 Secrets Ahead of Us: 
http://www.beforeus.com/64secrets.php * * * * * *
The Ark Conspiracy: 
http://www.beforeus.com/tac.php * * * * * * 
The Killing of Paradise Planet: 
http://www.beforeus.com/first.php * * * * * * * Surprise Witness http://www.beforeus.com/second.php * * * * * * * "The Corpse Came Back" http://www.beforeus.com/third.php  * * * * * * * “The Discovery That's Toppling Evolution” http://www.beforeus.com/evol.php ******* “UFO Aliens: The Deadly Secret” http://www.beforeus.com/aliens.html ******* “Stolen Identity” http://www.beforeus.com/stolen-id.php ******* “The Da Vinci Code Hoax” http://www.beforeus.com/da-vinci.php ******* Mysteries of a Lost World package
http://www.beforeus.com/mlw.php ******* “Secrets Exposed” package 
http://www.beforeus.com/secrets-exposed.php ******* HANDY PAGE FOR ALL E-BOOKS: http://www.beforeus.com/shopcart_ebooks.html   HANDY PAGE FOR ALL PHYSICAL BOOKS:  http://www.beforeus.com/shopcart_hc.html BOOK-DVD-CD/ROM PACKAGE Ark of the Covenant Book, CD-Rom, DVD Package:
 DVDs Surprising Discoveries 8 DVD set
 http://www.beforeus.com/8videos.html * * * * * * * 12 DVD package
 http://www.beforeus.com/dvds-12-set.html 14 Insider Report DVD package http://www.beforeus.com/dvds-new-12-set.html * * * * * * * Individual DVDs